My friend, Susan, attends a very liberal liberal-arts college. It offers no majors and has no class requirements. The intention, of course, is to remove all roadblocks from a student’s pursuit of their interests. I thought it sounded great. In high school and college I hated having to take classes I didn’t want. Also, I thought about the whiz kids whose gifts were being held back by requirement detours and the other students I knew who wanted to be in shop class but were forced to read Dickens.
Susan contrasts her college experience to her old days at a parochial boarding high school. There she had curfew. But Susan is a bird of her own feather (and a hard-working one) and would often stay up late studying. For this, she was punished.
I’m one to point out the negative repercussions of rules and regulations. I see the best in people when they are free to spread their wings, unfettered by policy holding them back for being “too young”, “too irresponsible”, or because “it’s too late to be up”. “Treat people like adults, and they’ll act like adults” I liked to say. Broad-brushing policy takes away a person’s sense of responsibility, I thought, and ultimately, takes away a bit of their humanity.
But there was a problem with my thinking. And it wasn’t that I was wrong; I just always failed to see the other side.
Very recently, I returned from a 7-day stay at a tai chi school on a mountain in Hubei Province, China. There, myself and the ten or so other attendees awoke at 5:30 each morning and were on the road jogging by 6:00. We practiced together; we ate together. Days were structured, directing my time and actions, and the group provided support (and pressure) to strive higher and stay focused.
I could have done this activity on my own. I mean, it’s physically possible. I could’ve relied on my own discipline to get up early and out the door for a jog. But I hadn’t.
This admittance, though obvious, was significant for me, because my bias for seeing the wrong with rules has me react anxiously to any such attempts at grouping and restricting. But there I was jogging in the early morning, then practicing the tai chi movements over and over (after my mind told me to quit) at the goading of my trainer. I became more focused and present in all my activities, in fact. Restrictions and control may rub me the wrong way, yet my freedom at this school was restricted, indeed.
While there I read an article by Malcolm Gladwell about a program in U.S. cities to help the chronically homeless. It, naturally, included elements of rules and structures. People quoted in the story said certain individuals need to be told what to do. Right away, I saw this argument as a way to make people dependant, limit their potential, and assume control. I cringed. But newly aware of my bias, I knew I wasn’t looking at such situations clearly, and so ought to look a second time. After all, as I was reading this I felt energized, calm, and healthy. Feeling the benefits of structure, I saw that the homeless in this story who had someone ordering them fared much better. What was evident at the time (and evident in the article) was that my motto about treating people like adults simply isn’t always true.
Now might this program be at risk for the wrongdoings of leadership? Might the subjects become dependent, settle for less, and never realize their potential? Yes and yes. And there’ll always be those examples for me to focus on, forever burrowing into my tunnel vision. But it’s hard to look away from what I, myself, experienced at the school. And I realized that never laying down rules, and being over-concerned about the wrongs this may lead to, misses the boat for the majority, if not all, people who benefit, at least at times, from being given orders.
More than seeing the truth that my bias blocked, I saw that the issue I have with orders goes further than a concern about seeing others being held back. There’s a fear of control (or a fear of the motivations that makes others want to control) in my makeup. I was reminded of the person who says proudly, “If someone demands I do something, I’m likely to do the opposite”. The problem here is if you’re not going to do something because another demands it, aren’t you still being controlled—by them and by your emotions? What if their demand is in your best interest? Your fear of being controlled, and of it being detrimental to you, leads you to act in ways that are, well, detrimental to you.
Over-concern about being told what to do is not a good thing. The truth, and the middle ground, is that orders are simply a method. They’re not always the best method, but sometimes they are—to help someone grow, to help structure our world, to help get things done. The trick is to know how/when to implement them. I don’t want a law telling everyone to get up at 5:30, but I can appreciate that a voluntary commitment to this tai chi school was good for me. There seems to be a “training wheels” aspect to orders. And though harder without these “wheels” right now, I have been getting up early and exercising on my own.
Know yourself. And for parents, recognize the line to draw with your kids. Sometimes “treating people like adults” doesn’t mean they “act like adults”. If it’s not the right person and situation, things can go worse—just as it did for the homeless addict who died in Gladwell’s article.
Susan spoke more about her liberal, liberal-arts college. This bird of her own feather admitted she was a little lost. That’s not too different than most sophomores, I suppose. The bigger issue I couldn’t deflect, though, was the many seniors she knows who have no idea what topic to write their graduate thesis on. This is unnerving as they’ve spent 4 or 5 years of their life, shelled out a ton of money ($43,000/yr tuition), and now can’t decide why they did so. (And this is after a competitive screening process accepts only those who would succeed in this kind of environment.) Yet according to Susan, many drop out or have a “gap year” to work and figure out what they want to do in life. I had to think that some of these students would have benefited from a few orders.






































































































